On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 18:20:34 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:

> ____/ Chris Mattern on Wednesday 05 March 2008 16:30 : \____
>
>> On 2008-03-05, Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@schestowitz.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> It might be more complicated than this. They are said to have back doors in
>>> *standard protocols* (Linux included) [1,2,3,4] and these are hard to get by
>>
>> Linux is not a protocol, standard or otherwise.
>
> A kernel does not make an operating platform complete, either. The question
> about 2.4 fallback is irrelevant here, but the argument still stands.

Linux is the kernel.
Linux is not the kernel.

You Linux dweebs change your arguments more than you change your panties.

--
Moshe Goldfarb
Collector of soaps from around the globe.
Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/