View Single Post
  #54 (permalink)  
Old 03-05-2008, 11:29 PM
The Ghost In The Machine
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Does kernel 2.6 include an NSA backdoor?

In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Sebastian G.
<seppi@seppig.de>
wrote
on Wed, 05 Mar 2008 21:46:26 +0100
<638f6cF26fso2U1@mid.dfncis.de>:
> The Ghost In The Machine wrote:
>
>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Sebastian G.
>> <seppi@seppig.de>
>> wrote
>> on Wed, 05 Mar 2008 18:46:40 +0100
>> <6384laF26l55mU1@mid.dfncis.de>:
>>> Bill Baka wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>>> They do it because they can.
>>>>> They don't do it because they can't.
>>>> Do you ever get out??
>>>> Just because you personally haven't gotten harassed by the government
>>>> doesn't mean they aren't watching you.
>>>
>>> No. You were claiming that they're accessing people's computers
>>> at the time, by an included backdoor. And that's obviously nonsense.

>>
>> Not as obvious as one might think.

>
>
> None of the things you mentioned gives any evidence that such a thing is
> happening.


Wasn't me in any event. ;-) And I don't use BitTorrent anyway.

>
> > I'd have to look to see how BitTorrent works but my understanding is that
> > a daemon uses surplus bandwidth, for example.

>
> Which is an obvious instance of the reasons why one
> shouldn't use untrusted software.


Agreed. Of course not everyone is competent to vet software.

> The BitTorrent client from Bram Cohen became untrustworthy
> when he decided to cooperate with the media mafia.
>


--
#191, ewill3@earthlink.net
Linux. Because life's too short for a buggy OS.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com


Reply With Quote