On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 18:05:18 +0100, Sebastian G. wrote:

> Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 04:14:55 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>
>>> I've worked for 2 days on resolving this (it took a long time to handle
>>> 100,000+ files). Unlike probably thousands of other Web sites that still have
>>> this iframe problem... (it's nothing to do with the site but a leech-type
>>> reference that get forcibly attached to it).
>>
>> What a wanker you are Roy.
>>
>> You can sit here and twist all you like, but YOUR SITE WAS COMPROMISED AND
>> USED TO INFECT OTHERS.
>
> There's no indication that his website was compromised. Stating it in big
> letters doesn't make any less false.

You mean other than the fact he admitted he spend 2 days cleaning up his
site to get rid of it, going through over 100,000 files?

No, other than that, ther's no indication.

>> That makes YOUR SITE the spreader, regardless of
>> where the malware was hosted, YOUR SITE was telling browsers to download
>
> Wrong as well. The spreaders are the users who advise their system to
> automagically install malware downloaded from a website.

In other words, Roy's website.