Moshe Goldfarb <brick.n.straw@gmail.com> writes:

> On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 11:18:33 -0400, Linonut wrote:
>
>> * Erik Funkenbusch peremptorily fired off this memo:
>>
>>>> And even in that case, no, it is not paranoia. There are plenty of
>>>> COLA-lurking clowns that would have a great time if they could hack
>>>> Roy's sites.
>>>>
>>>> And you know it.
>>>
>>> And you think any of them are capable of it?
>>
>> It doesn't matter. They are only a handshake away from someone who is
>> capable.
>>
>>> But that's irrelevant, since anyone with half a brain should know that
>>> these were not deliberate attacks against him, instead I believe he chooses
>>> to *PORTRAY* it as a deliberate attack, knowing that many in here will
>>> believe him.
>>
>> I don't believe Roy on this one. But I do believe it was a deliberate
>> attack, on my own evidence. Just because it is a common attack doesn't
>> make it non-deliberate.
>>
>> It is quite possible to me that someone said, hey, see what you can do
>> with this shestowitz.com site, hmm?
>
> Personally I believe there is no doubt that Roy Schestowitz was targeted,
> for whatever reason.
>
> Roy wishes to make himself known all over the Internet and that's fine.
> However, when a person takes a position of hate and lies and then tries to
> fool and mislead people, they tend to make a lot of enemies and very
> quickly.
>
> It could be any topic from car parts to DVD players when you start
> attracting attention, like boycott and hate sites usually do, you are going
> to have people who agree with you and people who don't.
>
> My theory is that Roy Schestowitz is angering the employees of these
> companies that he is constantly attacking and they in turn are offering him
> and his sites up as fresh meat to be discredited by people who take pride
> in cracking the code, so to speak.

He puts people's jobs at risk too.