Kwyjibo <kwyjibo@ozdebate.remove.com> wrote
> rebel <me@privacy.net> wrote
>> Michael <michael@yahoo.com> wrote
>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>>> Michael <michael@yahoo.com> wrote

>>>>>>> Telstra's chief executive, Sol Trujillo, refused last week to
>>>>>>> reveal the number of customers still using the CDMA network,
>>>>>>> giving rise to speculation a significant number still exist.
>>>>>>> But he did say that the CDMA customers contributed less than 3
>>>>>>> per cent of total mobile revenue of $3.19 billion.

>>>>>> seeing many of them are (like mine) used on the very occasional
>>>>>> foray into non-GSM territory, that probably means around half a
>>>>>> million subs still.

>>>>> No, substantially less than that.

>>>> Easy to claim. Hell of a lot harder to actually substantiate that claim.

>>> That's true, its commercial in confidence.

>> What a lame excuse. CIC is really about information you have from *others* that you are bound not to reveal because
>> you obtained it under privelege.

> Wrong.

>> Tel$tra's own data on the number of CDMA subs isn't in that category.

> How would you know?

Its obvious. That system is being turned off, fuckwit.

> You've already shown that you dodn't even
> understand what CIC is in the first place.

And you have just shown that you dont have a clue about what telstra can do with
that info any time they like, just like they can with the numbers now using NextG too.

>> Tel$tra have that information, it is *their* information, they can reveal it any time they like.

> They *can*, but don't have to.

But when they do with the numbers using the NextG system, and dont with
the number who havent bothered to change to the NextG system for whatever
reason, only a fool would be stupid enough to buy the lie that they cant say
how many are still on the cdma system because that info is CIC, fuckwit.

AND its only a stupid dunny cleaning fuckwit child that even claims that anyway.