On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 23:45:39 GMT, Jono <nothanks@blueyonder.invalid>
wrote:

>> A) ([2-4]x.<:@gw1> | xx.) instead of
>>
>> B) (xx. | [2-4]x.<:@gw1>)
>>
>> would the numbers starting with 2, 3 and 4 go through gw1 (with dial
>> plan A)?
>
>yes.....but there's still a lot of ambiguity - [2-4]x. or xx. would
>match numbers like 2xxxxx. Are your numbers that begin 2-4 of a
>specific length? If, for example they're 6 digit, use [2-4]xxxxxS0


My numbers starting (actually) from 2 to 9 - I entered 2-4 for
simplicity sake - all have 9 digits.

Yet, the instruction as above is working fine: I am being able to call
all the numbers I want to, starting with 2-9, with no problems.

Can you see any potential problem that I'm missing?

Best,
Jose