DTC <me@nothingtoseehere.zzx> wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
>> DTC <me@nothingtoseehere.zzx> wrote
>>> Larry wrote

>>>> The big boys have brought bags of cash to WiMax, now, and YOU haven't been keeping up!

>>> True...Just as so many investors brought bags of cash to internet startups ten years ago.

>> That isnt what happened.

> What didn't happen?

What preceeded that bit of mine, stupid.

> Investor didn't bring bags of money to startups?

You quite sure that you aint one of those rocket scientist stupids ?

> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dot-com_bubble
>

Quote:

> At the height of the boom, it was possible for a promising dot-com to make an initial public offering (IPO) of its > stock and raise a > substantial amount of money even though it had never made a profit >

Pity that wasnt internet startups in the technology sense being discussed.

>>> Therefore using the amount of cash infused into WiMax as a metric of it potential of success is flawed. Its not a
>>> metric of its
>>> success yet as it hasn't been deployed in enough areas to evaluate.

>> That last is a pig ignorant lie.

> How so?

Because it has been deployed in enough areas to evaluate.

>>> The failure of the Australian WiMax project

>> And that is another lie. There is no such animal that has failed.

> Garth Freeman does not share your opinion.
> http://mobile.slashdot.org/mobile/08.../1512220.shtml

Who cares ? That pimple on the bum of Australian broadband aint anything
even remotely resembling anything like 'the Australian WiMax project'

>>> has now moved to the finger pointing stage,

>> Yep, with a MUCH bigger broadband operation saying that
>> their WiMax using hardware from the same supplier works fine.

> Read what I said,

No point, it remains mindless pig ignorant shit no matter how often its reread.

> I didn't say it was a failure for him just because it was WiMax.

I didnt say you did.

> I said it could be anyone's fault at this point.

And that is just plain wrong when, like I said, a MUCH bigger broadband operation
says that their WiMax using hardware from the same supplier works fine.

All the evidence points to the fact that that fool Freeman doesnt have a fucking clue.

> As in poor vendor/carrier communication and setting expectations.

How odd that Internode has enough of a clue to be able to implement it fine.

From the same supplier too.

>>> so we really don't have any tangible facts why it allegedly failed.

>> Another lie.

> See above.

Completely useless, as always.

>> AND WiMax is an enhancement of wifi, which hordes use every single day too.

> WiMax has absolutely no comparison to WiFi, other than they both use radio waves.

Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that you have never ever had a fucking clue about anything at all, ever.