kony wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 10:39:00 GMT, "bnmohan via HWKB.com"
> <u35859@uwe> wrote:
>
>> Yes.
>> Now I have to see if the machine is faster. Unfortunately, I have not
>> benchmarked the slower performance.
>>
>
>
> No need to benchmark, it's unquestionably faster if it were
> staying at the lower speed previously. Only remaining
> factor is whether the low processor speed was what
> bottlenecked the use in which you perceived the slowness,
> other things like a slow notebook hard drive, malwave,
> filesystem fragmentation, can also seem more impactful on a
> laptop which inherantly has a disk subsystem handicap
> compared to a desktop.

He can compare the 2x256MB configuration, to the 256MB + 1GB
configuration. The first may be a dual channel configuration,
the second a virtual single channel config. If there is
no significant difference, then nothing more need be done.
If the 1.25GB configuration is slower, then purchasing a
matched 2x1GB configuration is a possible solution.

Paul