Brian A wrote:

> I agree that this was introduced to stop fraud but it is a case of
> what is the 'fall out' for the ordinary honest user. They actually say
> "per unique IP address" on JustVoip. An IP address is 'unique' so I
> think they have chosen the wrong word here.
> I think they mean per
> single, static IP address -

Why?
I have 3 internet connections through 2 separate accounts 2 of which
have dynamic IP Addresses. Both home connection and work connection use
the same voipcheap account to dial out, thereby using the same minutes
in other words doubling up on the free minutes.

> and therein lies the problem. Just last
> week I set up an SPA-3102 for some relations. I did consider setting
> up the ATA to make calls directly but I couldn't take the risk with
> someone else's set up -

I would have thought using voxalot was _more_ of a risk.
How can setting up an ATA to do what it's made to do be risky?

All you are doing by using voxalot surely is introducing an additional
point of failure into the chain.

Am I missing something?

Pete
--
http://gymratz.co.uk - Fitness & Gym Equipment/nutrition specialists.
http://www.trade-price-supplements.co.uk - Bulk buy for up to 33% off.
http://www.BBE-Boxing-Equipment.co.uk - New Boxing Equipment site.
http://www.commercial-gym-equipment.co.uk - Commercial Gym Equipment.