Elmo P. Shagnasty wrote:
> In article <uxKQj.23039$%41.3252@nlpi064.nbdc.sbc.com>,
> DTC <me@nothingtoseehere.zzx> wrote:
>
>>> Like I said, the cell companies would be fined hundreds of these fines
>>> daily.
>> IF..IF there was some sort of FCC law that allowed that. But there isn't
>> and so they aren't.
>
> Sure there is. If the cell companies know damned well they have a black
> hole on the street, and CHOOSE not to fix it, then by definition they're
> interfering with emergency communications AT LEAST to the same level as
> the restaurant owner who installs a jammer.

There is NO such FCC law. FCC law is applies to radiating an
electromagnetic signal, not inattention.

> It's the INTENT. And the cell phone owner is claiming that he needs to
> be able to make an emergency call anywhere he decides he needs to, right?

Intent has nothing to do with it. Wrong, your ridiculous statement is
beyond any reply that I can think up.