On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:13:22 +1000, kcoj wrote:

> Paul Day wrote:
>> On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 10:57:14 DavidBee may have written:
>> <snip>
>>
>> Just to ask the obvious, but was there any reason she didn't call up and
>> suspend the account as soon as she realised her mobile had been nicked?
>>
>> PD
>>
> because someone people are just plain stupid or worse dumb.

Or perhaps she reported it within hours of the theft, immediately after
she first noticed it missing, but by that time the "Habbo credit" had
already been purchased?


> as she has not "reported" the theft of the phone the debate over who has
> to pay is irrelevant, the phone owner/account holder is responsible.
> FULL STOP

There's no "debate" over who has to pay the phone company, stupid. The
OP's question was directed at recovery of the $400 from another source,
namely, the criminal who stole his daughter's phone.


> sad but true, if is doubt read the T&C of the contract or agreement.

No-one's in doubt, stupid.