kcoj <poguemahone@shithappens.com> wrote
> Paul Day wrote
>> DavidBee wrote

>> Just to ask the obvious, but was there any reason she didn't call up and suspend the account as soon as she realised
>> her mobile had been nicked?

> because someone people are just plain stupid or worse dumb.

> as she has not "reported" the theft of the phone

Easy to claim, hell of a lot harder to actually substantiate that claim.

> the debate over who has to pay is irrelevant,

Only in your pathetic little pig ignorant drug crazed fantasyland.

> the phone owner/account holder is responsible. FULL STOP

Wrong, as always.

> sad but true, if is doubt read the T&C of the contract or agreement.

Has no relevance what so ever to the law, fuckwit child.