"Paul Day" <pauls@enigma.id.au> wrote in message
news:1209290291.798791@colossus.enigma.id.au...
> On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:33:11 Horry may have written:
>> > as she has not "reported" the theft of the phone the debate over who
>> > has
>> > to pay is irrelevant, the phone owner/account holder is responsible.
>> > FULL STOP
>>
>> There's no "debate" over who has to pay the phone company, stupid.
>
> Isn't there? Can her phone company prove _she_ consented to the 19
> number charges?

"She" doesnt need to consent. "She" is the legal lessee of the service,
regardless of who uses the service.

She/Police can try to take that person to court to recoup costs, but "she"
is still legally liable for the debt

>
> PD
>
> --
> Paul Day