On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 04:48:29 GMT, "Alan Parkington"
<patriot@iheartaustralia.com.au> wrote:

>
>"rebel" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
>news:g8aa145a1nsdpd0rvdg6h56dnl1ke54seg@4ax.com.. .
>> On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 08:13:37 GMT, "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Paul Day" <pauls@enigma.id.au> wrote in message
>>>news:1208928345.221865@colossus.enigma.id.au. ..
>>>> On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:25:49 Alan Parkington may have written:
>>>>> The Next G network offers a larger mobile coverage footprint than the
>>>>> old CDMA network, covering more than 2 million square kilometres as
>>>>> compared to CDMA which covered more than 1.6 million square
>>>>> kilometres.
>>>>
>>>> ...just not in all the same physical locations CDMA coverred.
>>>
>>>Clearly it must cover almost all of the CDMA covered.
>>
>> and it was *supposed to* cover all of it, and more
>
>Where does it say that?

Geez, you new on the planet? That was discussed at GREAT_LENGTH last year, and
the original commitment was quoted where Telstra or their mouthpiece_du_jour
gave that undertaking.

And your challenging that now shows the lie to all the Telscum claims. You may
have managed to hoodwink Conroy, but you've got a long way to go before you
hoodwink the users.