View Single Post
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 04-30-2008, 12:45 PM
Sebastian G.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Help with AVG Anti-virus email scanning

Ertugrul Söylemez wrote:

> "Sebastian G." <seppi@seppig.de> wrote:
>
>>> What's wrong with HTML emails without remote content?

>> <!doctype stupid><html><head><meta name="foo"
>> content="bar"><title>baz</title></head><body><p>Nothing, it's very
>> readible if the receiver's client doesn't support HTML.</body></html>

>
> That's why usually there is also a text/plain part.



usually = not quite often?

What about MIME? There the plain/text part you get just reads "This is a
multipart MIME message".


>> Because there's no standard for it, neither de-jure nor de-facto?
>> because there is a standard to include some basic formatting
>> (text/enriched)? [...]

>
> MIME is a standard. It allows multipart-emails. HTML is also a
> standard. Together with a standard MIME type name for HTML, that makes
> HTML mails completely standardized.



No. It makes HTML files as attachments standardized.

>> Because it's a waste or bandwidth?

>
> A waste of bandwidth? A few kilobytes per person per day?



Would you please think of the children^W dial-up users?

> Demanding CR/LF instead of
> sole LF for telnet-like protocols (including HTTP) must be a waste also.



No. Actually I think the CR/LF interpretation is the correct one, and HTTP
is supposed to be human-readable on pure terminals.

> You want to know, what _really_ is a waste today? Two people from the
> same local subnet listening to the same internet radio station -- that
> _is_ a waste of traffic.



Well, it's not like my systems would deny the usage of multicast. You have
to blame my ISP.

>> Because eMail isn't supposed to emit any formatting?

>
> Oh yeah, everything that was made up in the 70s and 80s was ultimate.
> There is no reason for inventions. In fact, we don't even need X11 or
> OpenGL. Back to phosphor terminals!



Stupid. If you want a protocol for formatted documents, then either propose
a standard extension to eMail or a completely new protocol.

>> Because HTML is meant for hypertext, not formatted documents?

>
> Maybe HTML 1.0 was. Today, hypertext is one of many features of HTML.



Hypertext is the primary feature of HTML, even today.

Reply With Quote