SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com> amazed us all with the following in
news:EzTRj.231$3O7.61@newssvr19.news.prodigy.net:

> B. Peg wrote:
>> Sorry, but after the dismal support of Verizon with their crippled
>> phone software/hardware (e.g. Bluetooth to car audio system) why
>> would I want to go to them? Now that CA law requires hands-free in
>> July, some of their damn phones still do not work although they are
>> supposedly "Bluetooth capable," just not unlocked by Verizon.
>
> There is only one reason to go to Verizon, and that's coverage. Well
> maybe the fact that they have a larger and faster 3G network is a
> factor to some people as well.
>
> But no argument over their crippled handsets. Amusingly, while
> Motorola continues to lose market share, one advantage they have, but
> can't advertise, is that it's easy to uncripple the handsets they
> cripple for Verizon.
>

Gee, Steve- did you miss my requesat for data to support your specific
claim that Verizon is the only carrier looked at by a large group of
people?