"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:67mkmmF2oha4kU1@mid.individual.net...
> Michael <michael@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> "rebel" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
>> news:g8aa145a1nsdpd0rvdg6h56dnl1ke54seg@4ax.com...
>>> On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 08:13:37 GMT, "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "Paul Day" <pauls@enigma.id.au> wrote in message
>>>> news:1208928345.221865@colossus.enigma.id.au...
>>>>> On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:25:49 Alan Parkington may have written:
>>>>>> The Next G network offers a larger mobile coverage footprint than
>>>>>> the old CDMA network, covering more than 2 million square
>>>>>> kilometres as compared to CDMA which covered more than 1.6
>>>>>> million square kilometres.
>>>>>
>>>>> ...just not in all the same physical locations CDMA coverred.
>>>>
>>>> Clearly it must cover almost all of the CDMA covered.
>>>
>>> and it was *supposed to* cover all of it, and more
>>
>> that was never the intention
>
> It was what Telstra claimed to the Senate.
>

Burgess also brown-eyed the Senate and Rudd. Parliamentarians get to obey
Telstra now, and handover the $4.7bill, else have their parliamentary
telephones disconnected.


** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **