BaJoRi wrote:
> "clifto" <clifto@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:d951f5-quo.ln1@remote.clifto.com...
>> BaJoRi wrote:
>>> You do realize that the guy forwarding this theory has been proven to not
>>> even have a science degree from an accredited learning institution,
>>
>> So it should be really, really easy for you to mention facts that shoot
>> holes in his theory.
>>
>>> has
>>> posited these types of theories in the past (and been wrong),
>>
>> Cite.
>>
>>> has faced
>>> fraud indictments
>>
>> Cite.
>>
>>> and is a convicted felon,
>>
>> Cite.
>>
>>> and is generally a quack?
>>
>> I like him a whole lot better than I can tolerate you.
>
> Because you don't like people who can actually read.

No, I intensely dislike people whose only tactic is ad hominem. You
delivered 100% personal attack and 0% fact.

> Here is a name: look
> him up. Google should do fine. Luis Sancho. Have fun.

You made the assertions, you provide the evidence. Once again all I have
is a name you accused, just more ad hominem. 100% personal attack and 0% fact.

--
"[i]t's not surprising, then, that they get bitter, they cling to guns or
religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant
sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."
-- Barack Obama at a meeting with his equals, the elitist bourgeoisie