View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 05-06-2008, 11:39 AM
B J Foster
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Telstra chairman hits back at Optus

Rod Speed wrote:
> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote
>> Rod Speed wrote
>>> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote
>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote
>>>>>> Alan Parkington wrote

>
>>>>>>> From
>>>>>>> http://www.businessspectator.com.au/...D?OpenDocument

>
>>>>>>> Telstra Chairman Donald McGauchie has hit out at the Optus-backed
>>>>>>> G9 consortium's renewed interest in building the national
>>>>>>> broadband network, declaring Telstra the only viable bidder.

>
>>>>>> Telstra is planning to start in the cities.

>
>>>>> So is labor.

>
>>>>>> The government wants broadband in the bush.

>
>>>>> That govt has gone, stupid.

>
>>>> The *labor* government wants 98% coverage,

>
>>> So it clearly wants a hell of a lot more than broadband in the bush, fuckwit.

>
>>>> how do you suppose they will achieve that by starting in the cities?

>
>>> They START in the citys and end up doing the bush as well, fuckwit.

>
>> And when do you suppose they will end?

>
> Well after they start, fuckwit.
>
>>>>>> It's good business to pay attention to your
>>>>>> biggest customer - one would have thought

>
>>>>> Only when you noticed that the govt has changed.

>
>>>> Well of course its entirely possible that Labor can't do arithmetic but neither can you

>
>>> You in spades. 98% is a hell of a lot more than JUST the bush, fuckwit.

>
>>> And the real bush is the 2% that isnt even covered, fuckwit.

>
>> ...but apparently you would

>
> Nope, its never going to be feasible or sensible to deliver FTTN everywhere, fuckwit.


I never commented on the feasibility, twit, it is Labor's goal to cover
98% of the population.

That's going to take longer if they start in the city. Try to keep up.

>
>>>>>>> "The new government has a view as to what they want out of
>>>>>>> telecommunications and we'll do our very best to work with
>>>>>>> that," Mr McGauchie said.

>
>>>>>> Huh?

>
>


Reply With Quote