"Alan Parkington" <patriot@iheartaustralia.com.au> wrote in message
news:GIZTj.8163$ko5.4692@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>
> "Paul Day" <pauls@enigma.id.au> wrote in message
> news:1210061375.484162@colossus.enigma.id.au...
>> On Tue, 06 May 2008 15:12:49 in aus.comms.mobile Alan Parkington may have
>> written:
>>> >> >> Though by world standards Australia's mobile telephone services
>>> >> >> are
>>> >> >> unreasonably expensive,
>>> >> >
>>> >> > I am surprised that you would allow us to see that, Parky bot!
>>> >>
>>> >> Not at alll. you get the best with Telstra so you have to expect to
>>> >> pay a
>>> >> fraction more than the cheap overseas Singaporean and pommy junk..
>>> >
>>> > No, you pay an unreasonably expensive amount more, not a fraction.
>>> > Clearly stated in the article you recited like a parrot.
>>> >
>>>
>>> Actually the article claimed Australian costs were 'high'.. not
>>> specifically
>>> Telstra's.
>>
>> Can't even read what he's written...
>>
>> Alan, your article is quoted at the top of this post. Just in case you
>> can't spot it, I'll paste it again: "Though by world standards
>> Australia's mobile telephone services are unreasonably expensive,"
>>
>> Note the words "unreasonably expensive" and the common knowledge that
>> Telstra leads the way in expensive mobile phone service charges in the
>> Australian market.
>>
>> PD
>>
>
> Listen Dummy..

Hehe. Obviously been to the Telstra 'Customer Service' school.....

> the article only says that charges could be considered expensive, not that
> they necessarily are expensive.

Wrong. It says "Australia's mobile telephone services *ARE* unreasonably
expensive"

> Also it does not mention Telstra as being expensice either.

It doesn't need to. As Telstra are the dearest mobile carrier in the
country, it goes without saying that if Australia's mobile phone services
are expensive, Telstra *must* be unreasonably expensive.

--
Kwyj.