Alan Poxington <wanker@iarseaustralia.com.au> wrote
> Paul Day <pauls@enigma.id.au> wrote
>> Alan Poxington <wanker@iarseaustralia.com.au> wrote
>>> Paul Day <pauls@enigma.id.au> wrote
>>>> Alan Poxington <wanker@iarseaustralia.com.au> wrote
>>>>> Polly the Parrot <flatulantdingo@deadspam.com> wrote
>>>>>> Alan Poxington <wanker@iarseaustralia.com.au> wrote

>>>>>>> Though by world standards Australia's mobile telephone services are unreasonably expensive,

>>>>>> I am surprised that you would allow us to see that, Parky bot!

>>>>> Not at alll. you get the best with Telstra so you have to expect to pay a
>>>>> fraction more than the cheap overseas Singaporean and pommy junk..

>>>> No, you pay an unreasonably expensive amount more, not a fraction.
>>>> Clearly stated in the article you recited like a parrot.

>>> Actually the article claimed Australian costs were 'high'.. not specifically Telstra's.

Pity Telstra dominates the expensive end of Aust mobile services, fuckwit.

>> Can't even read what he's written...

>> Alan, your article is quoted at the top of this post. Just in case
>> you can't spot it, I'll paste it again: "Though by world standards
>> Australia's mobile telephone services are unreasonably expensive,"

>> Note the words "unreasonably expensive" and the common knowledge that Telstra leads the way in expensive mobile phone
>> service charges in the Australian market.

> Listen Dummy.. the article only says that charges could be considered expensive, not that they necessarily are
> expensive.

Bare faced lie. Read the quote right at the top, fuckwit.

> Also it does not mention Telstra as being expensice either.

Doesnt need to when it dominates Aust mobile services, fuckwit.