On Thu, 08 May 2008 18:51:36 +0000, Larry <noone@home.com> wrote:

>Ron <ronclifford@peoplepc.com> wrote in
>news:1h7624h12e1g1rptfcosh3ago62qtvhmu2@4ax.com :
>
>> On Thu, 08 May 2008 14:40:28 +0000, Larry <noone@home.com> wrote:
>>
>>>SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote in news:BIvUj.2039$7k7.1026
>>>@flpi150.ffdc.sbc.com:
>>>
>>>> OTOH, it's probably not going to have as good a browser as
>>>> the iPhone
>>>
>>>http://securityevaluators.com/iphone/
>>>Yeah, great...
>>>
>>>I'm also curious as to why Apple got University of Washington's Emerging
>>>Technology group to remove this from their own website:
>>
>> Because Apple charges for that information as part of attending
>> a Developers Conference.
>>
>> No different than John Wiley getting upset if a Chemistry textbook
>> of theirs was posted on the web.
>>
>>
>
>Apple charges for the specification lists? That IS arrogance!


There are charges attached to the iPhone SDK, now at beta 5.