>>And anyone speaking in the context of closing a NATIONAL NETWORK and
>>replacing it with another NATIONAL NETWORK would clearly believe "same"
>>and
>>"equivalent" refers to the total coverage supplied by those respective
>>NATIONAL NETWORKS.
>>
>>They didnt close CDMA just in Upper East Wonthaggi Heights- they closed it
>>NATIONALLY
>
> By your reasoning (sic) if CDMA covered 98% of Oz, and let's be kind and
> say
> nextG covers 99% of Oz, then .,..
>
> To apply NextG over ALL of mainland Australia and NONE of Tasmania (which
> is
> less than 1% of Oz) would be same/equivalent or better.

Not a relevant comparison, as every CDMA base was replaced with a NextG one,
and then some


>
> Yeah, right.