Kayman wrote:

> isn't is accord with (his) scientific facts...

^^^^^
Proof that you're an idiot.

> the pragmatic/realistic proof is in the pudding.


There is none. You cannot proof that you've cleaned the system just by the
absence of obvious signs.


> I haven't seen one post where David's Multi-AV wasn't helpful and
> beneficial.


Of course, since those fools don't understand the meaning of system
integrity. It was helpful insofar that it seemed to cure the symptoms, but
it never restored the system to a well-defined state, leaving all future
work unreliable and potentially compromised.