"Justin" <nospam@insightbb.com> wrote in message
news:slrng6l6kl.m1d.nospam@debian.dns2go.com...
> RBM wrote on [Tue, 1 Jul 2008 16:23:48 -0400]:
>>
>> "Oxford" <apony@pasture.com> wrote in message
>> news:apony-E4389A.13010901072008@news.qwest.net...
>>> "BruceR" <bruceNO@SPAMwhoever.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> ...and your reason for posting this to the T-Mobile (and other non-ATT)
>>>> groups is? I know this may be difficult for you to understand, but
>>>> those
>>>> of us who are happy with their non-ATT carriers just don't care about
>>>> the iphone.
>>>
>>> ah, within a few years, 60% of the population will have an iPhone so
>>> it's good to let people start learning about them now.
>>>
>>> and if you noticed, today AT&T said they will soon sell iPhones with no
>>> contract so that opens the door wide open for T-Mobile people wanting to
>>> move up to an iPhone.
>>>
>>> so sit back, watch the tour and enjoy a glimpse into your future!
>>>
>>> http://www.apple.com/iphone/guidedtour/tour/large.html
>>>
>>> (or for slower connections, you can fully download or choose a smaller
>>> sized version of the tour here)
>>>
>>> http://www.apple.com/iphone/guidedtour/
>>>
>>
>> Personally, I'd be happy as a clam if Apple earned 60% of the cell phone
>> business, but, if they do, it'll be because they've developed a product
>> that
>
> Screw that, Apple would be tyrannical with a market share like that

I think you have it wrong. It's partially their tyrannical attitude that
prevents them from gaining market share. Possibly, if they lost the
attitude, the tyranny, and the smarmy little piss ants like Oxford and
company, they'd do much better