[POSTED TO alt.internet.wireless - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <pDZ1f.396220$5N3.45554@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> on Sun, 09 Oct
2005 00:37:41 GMT, John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote:

>[POSTED TO alt.internet.wireless - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
>In <di9hab$32l$2@blue.rahul.net> on Sat, 8 Oct 2005 22:30:35 +0000 (UTC),
>dold@XReXXNetge.usenet.us.com wrote:
>
>>John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>>> These results were consistent with two different samples of each card.
>>> (That's not statistically valid, but better than just one of each.)
>>
>>That sounds like a small anecdotal observation.
>
>As I wrote. Notwithstanding a great deal of testing and documentation. So do
>you have anything substantive to add (e.g., evidence one way or the other), or
>(with apologies to Peggy Lee) is that all there is? ;)

My apologies for being snippy -- I was tired and cranky when I wrote that.

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>