On Nov 22, 10:42 pm, "Mr. Strat" <r...@nospam.techline.com> wrote:
> In article
> <4928844d$0$7519$5a62a...@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au>, Seon
>
> Ferguson <seo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > In other words outlaw Homosexuality? So what do you think should happen when
> > they get caught?
>
> Did I say to outlaw it? That's not very feasible.

You said, "Ignore their demands that their perversion be sanctioned."

Now, what you refer to as "perversion", we take to mean their
homosexuality, or, more to the point, their homosexual sexual
behavior.

Free Clue: The "perversion" has already been "sanctioned". By the
U.S. Supreme Court. Lawrence v. Texas. So no discussion here. Done
deal.

If you're suggesting that their "perversion" is NOT about their
homosexual sexual behavior, which has already been "sanctioned"
nationwide, and is instead about their wishing legal recognition of
their MARRIAGES, then what you are REALLY saying is that the act of
MARRYING is a perversion... and I'm QUITE sure THAT isn't what you
meant.

An attempt to back-pedal here will be fun for us to watch. Have at it!