Re: Lesbians, condoms go wild in attack on Christian church On Nov 24, 2:02*am, "Mr. Strat" <r...@nospam.techline.com> wrote:
> In article
> <4928ece7$0$18664$5a62a...@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au>, Seon
>
> Ferguson <seo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > You don't want "their perversion be sanctioned" so what does that mean,not
> > legalise homosexuality?
>
> Let 'em protest all they want. They already have all the rights that
> you and I have under the Constitution. But they won't be happy until
> they can fuck their buddies in the ass at high noon in the middle of
> town.
Well if that's true then public sex shouldn't be legalised. I have no
problem with 2 gay's holding hands or kissing but I'd be just as
disgusted at seeing public gay sex as I would be if a straight couple
went at it. I apply the same standards to everyone. I guess that's
where I draw the line. But if it's in their own home then what right
do we have to stop it? |