Re: Security fears over MS October patches... Dazz wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 09:01:43 GMT, McSpreader <invalid@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>Imhotep <Imhotep@nospam.net> wrote in news:LN6dnaX1b4opcsveRVn-
>>vg@adelphia.com:
>>
>>> Now do /you/ have any questions?
>>
>>Yes. What was the point of your original post?
>
> I believe lmhotep posted a link to an article that discussed some
> security patches.
That was the point.
> Maybe that was the point?
It was.
> At least that's how I perceived it.
>
> And quite frankly, I'm glad he posted it.
>
> Hmmm, that reminds me. Quite some time ago I signed up for SMS alerts
> to critical security patches so that I was kept in the loop - I
> haven't received an alert from M$ in at least 7 months.
>
> Glad I don't just rely on them to keep me informed. :-|
>
> Dazz
The poster McSpead thought something else. However, any and all
information /should/ be posted. In this sense the application or OS is not
important. Yet sadly, there is the always one in very crowd that tries to
make it out to be this OS vs that OS. I will always admit that I am /not/
and MS fan. However, if I ignored posting the information I would *not* be
hurting MS but rather the people who use it.
Imhotep |