On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 07:32:51 -0000, "Ivor Jones"
<ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:

>But the *cheapest* way is free, hence this doesn't qualify

by the same token would a free but unreliable service fail to meet the
requirement to *have* an incoming number, as opposed to a number that
ought to be incoming but unfortunately isn't working right now :-)

Phil
--

Usenet spam eaten by a Hamster http://www.tglsoft.de/
No more cable clowns :-))
Please do not feed or re-quote the trolls.