DevilsPGD <DeathToSpam@crazyhat.net> wrote in
news:9bkt35pm4llbjtd2kk78sf4fo4i1t8n14h@4ax.com:

> In message <Xns9C3060816D042blutofabercom@85.214.105.209> John
> Blutarsky <bluto@faber.com> was claimed to have wrote:
>
>>Oxford <apony@pasture.com> wrote in news:apony-BC2307.22365719062009
>>@news.qwest.net:
>>
>>> there are some nice charts at the below link showing the quickness
>>> of the new iphone... enjoy...
>>>
>>> In loading a series of complex websites over Wi-Fi, AnandTech has
>>> found that the 3G S is about 54 percent faster on average than the
>>> 3G and, in a few cases, is about three times faster. But it's also
>>> about 11 percent faster than the Palm Pre, which shares WebKit as a
>>> rendering engine, and is only slower in two out of nine tests. That
>>> lead only grows wider with the T-Mobile G1: as it's slower than the
>>> iPhone 3G, it's often twice as fast or more.
>>>
>>> Load times for commonly available apps were less dramatic between
>>> iPhones but only exacerbated the gaps between the Pre and Apple's
>>> hardware. A 3G S is between 13 percent and 42 percent faster at
>>> loading these apps versus a 3G depending on conditions, but it
>>> starts these roughly between two and four times faster than a Pre.
>>> Again, the sole Android phone in the comparison is slower still in
>>> all but Google Maps.
>>
>>
>>I'm not aware of any apps these phones share- care to enlighten me?
>
> Google Maps, as an example, is available on nearly every mobile
> platform in one fashion or another.
>
> More significantly though, even if the bundled software isn't the same
> software, you can measure the iPhone's webbrowser vs the G1's
> webbrowser vs Windows Mobile's browser, sticking only with the primary
> built-in browser as a lowest-common-denominator.
>

I'm fine with the browser vs. browser aomcparison because it makes sense.
Saying that a comparison of apps was done is too much of a stretch.