Tim Murray wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:03:44 -0400, John Navas wrote:
>> On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:41:16 -0600, David Moyer <davmoy@world.com> wrote
>> in <4a43d2dc$0$89396$815e3792@news.qwest.net>:
>>
>>> News <News@Group.Name> wrote:
>>>>> Yep, that's wretched excess and inefficiency for ya!
>>> nah, it just illustrates extreme ease of use and popularity of a highly
>>> functional phone.
>> How so?
>>
>>
>
> Since you didn't comprehend David's simple reply, let me draw you a picture.
> Take the universe of all phones. Inside that universe you have the set that
> can browse at all, which I would include the simple WAP sites. Among that set
> we find the iPhone. Although the iPhone is not a major slice of all those
> phones, it's still responsible for most smart-phone web traffic.
>
> If it were not popular and easy to use, it would never had had that much of
> the traffic.
>
> Think you can wrap your head around that?


What, your rationalization and apologia for wretched excess and
inefficiency?