Thread: Femtocells
View Single Post
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 09:55 AM
mark
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Femtocells

On Jun 30, 12:51*am, "Steve Terry" <gFOUR...@tesco.net> wrote:
> "Jon" <s...@jonparker.plus.com> wrote in message
>
> >> >Secure connection. UMA transport is over secure tunnel between the
> >> >handset and the Security Gateway within the UMA core.

>
> >> Sodding CIA / NSA / MI5 always listening in on my calls from the chilled
> >> food isle at the supermarket to back home.

>
> > So when you're up against something you can't argue against you resort
> > to a silly comment. Nice to see that some things never change.

>
> People who need real phone security wouldn't just rely on what a
> femtocell can provide
>


Well, it's not really for voice security ... it's more to protect the
idenity of the SIM - but it does also protect the voice path from
those sniffing WiFi.

> Back in the real world, people need more real BTS, not poncing off
> VOIP over some poor sods BB
>


I tend to agree, although we will never be in the position of having
100% coverage - especially indoor. For some it will be useful, for
others not. Certainly in other parts of Europe UMA and Femto is more
popular.

Cheers,
Mark

Reply With Quote