On 12/7/09 9:07 AM, in article hfj5nc$kda$1@posting2.glorb.com,
"WindsorFox<[SS]>" <windsor.fox.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:

> George Kerby wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/4/09 2:22 PM, in article hfbqt3$1j0$1@lust.ihug.co.nz, "Your Name"
>> <your.name@isp.com> wrote:
>>
>>> "WindsorFox<[SS]>" <windsor.fox.usenet@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:hfbl63$fl6$1@posting2.glorb.com...
>>>> Only in the fanboi's eyes who refuses to admit Apple's stuff is
>>>> expensive.
>>> Because it isn't. If you actually compare systems with the same specs you'll
>>> discover the Mac is only slightly more expensive and in some cases is
>>> actually cheaper.
>>>
>>> Even if that wasn't so, complaining that Apple is "expensive" is like
>>> complaining that Ferraris and Rolls Royces are expensive because India's
>>> Tato sell a $2,000 car. You're comparing Apples to lemons. :-\ You usually
>>> get what you pay for - pay peanuts to the elephants and you'll get crap.
>>>
>>>
>> You are dealing with a deficient individual. It's like trying to converse
>> with a crustacean. Don't waste the time...
>>
>
> The only deficient individual that I have yet to see in this group
> sir, is you. You have never contributed anything of relevance inn any
> reply that I have found from you in this group. You are a
> pseudo-intellectual troll who apparently know little or nothing about
> the equipment being discussed in this group. Please go back to your
> quiet state and leave the discussion to those who actually have
> something semi-pertinent to say.

pot = kettle

Please get out of your mother's basement and find a job, Kermit.