John Navas wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 11:12:42 GMT, "Duane Arnold"
> <Yeah-Don't-bother-@that's-right.BET> wrote in
> <K4DEg.6633$Qf.1494@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.n et>:
>
>
>>"John Navas" <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote in message
>>news:qae5e2pleb652t4u60hi1c3d286h645k32@4ax.com. ..
>>
>>>On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 05:30:02 GMT, "Duane Arnold"
>>><Yeah-Don't-bother-@that's-right.BET> wrote in
>>><u3yEg.6546$Qf.1135@newsread2.news.pas.earthlin k.net>:
>>>
>>>
>>>>... It doesn't make any difference what
>>>>router you get, as they all work the same. .
>>>
>>>With all due respect, it does matter -- there are considerable
>>>differences between different products.
>>
>>You want to come up with some kind of proof here that plugging a print
>>server or printer with a built-in print server into a Ethernet LAN port on
>>some NAT router for home usage is going to be different between one router
>>to the next.
>
>
> Sure. I've seen quite a few flaky wireless routers that produced
> symptoms of printing not working.

See, that's the problem with *wireless* you moron. Do you hear me?
>
>
>>That's what we're talking about and nothing else.
>
>
> Not with a flat statement like that.
>
>
>>You know something. I am really getting tired of you.
>
>
> Ditto.

Yeah I know. Somehow in your pea brain you think the NG is yours and you
have lost touch with reality with posts, posts and more posts.
>
>
>>You post too damn much
>>for you're own good.
>
>
> Feel free to filter me out.
>

No, you stop posting to me you *clown*. Better yet, go find a *woman*
and get the hell off the Internet. Any real *woman* she could be 80 as
far as you are concerned would be better than your Circuit City
mistress, just get the hell of the Internet for awhile.

Could you do a week or two, because you're choking the NG out with your
129,000 posts a week.

Duane :(