kony <spam@spam.com> wrote
> visions of effty <impeach_the_shrub@verizon.net> wrote

>> This topic actually makes me curious. I think it's a legal grey
>> area that MS takes advantage of, but I wonder where the right
>> to define what constitutes the "system" (and such) actually falls?

> It's also been discussed over and over on usenet, there
> is no point in rehashing again in a hardware group.

Yes there is when its repair being discussed.

That other discussion involves selling the OS separate
to the hardware and MS cant legally sustain that claim
either in any country with a decent legal system anyway.