View Single Post
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-03-2006, 08:22 PM
Yugo
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Still one more question about AMD processors

Me and Paul were having this discussion. (Quoted text is Paul's) But it seems
Paul is busy today... or maybe I made a complete fool of myself, but I still
don't understand. My question is at the very end of the text, but following
the discussion might help.

I would like to thank Paul for all the information he's provided so far.

---------------

> Cool N' Quiet is a feature of Athlon64 processors. When Windows
> is idle, the "CPU driver" can write a FID (frequency) control
> register, and drop the processor from 2400MHz, to 1000MHz. Since in many

interactive (web surfing, email) situations, the
> processor is idle most of the time, this saves electricity
> and makes the processor run cooler. It immediately speeds up
> as soon as you move the mouse.


It seems there's also a driver for Linux 2.6.10 and later kernels:

AMD Turion™ 64 Mobile Technology Processors,
AMD Opteron™ Processors, and
AMD Athlon™ 64 Processors Driver Version 1.60.01 for Linux 2.6. - Supports all
AMD Turion™ 64 Mobile Technology Processors, AMD Opteron™ Processors, and
Athlon™ 64 Processors released through 2006. Provides support for AMD
PowerNow!™ technology and, where appropriate, AMD’s Cool-n-Quiet™ technology
for Linux systems. Works with all kernels, version 2.6.10 or later. Requires
cpufreq-1.20, cpuspeed-1.20.1, or powersaved-0.8.19 or later to support SMP
and dual-core systems.

http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/...1_9706,00.html

So, the same processor may run at different wattages. OK.

> When the processor is running at full speed (say you are shrinking
> a DVD before writing a movie to a blank DVD), then the power difference
> between the high power and low power processors takes
> effect. Maybe if you kept your processor busy all the time,
> the lower power rated processor would give you a cooler running
> computer. But for interactive style usage, the Cool N' Quiet feature
> saves plenty of power.


I see... but I'm afraid I'll have a question below.

> As an example, look at PDF page 17 of this document. It shows the processor
> ADA3500DEP4AS, a 3500+.
>
>
><http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/white_papers_and_tech_docs/30430.pdf>
>
> The allowed operating conditions, tested at the factory are:
>
> Name Power Frequency
> Max Pstate 89W 2200MHz
> Intermediate Pstate #1 69W 2000MHz
> Intermediate Pstate #2 50W 1800MHz
> Min Pstate 22W 1000MHz


Ok. Now, here's the SAME processor at:

http://www.amdcompare.com/us-en/desktop/default.aspx

Processor: AMD Athlon™ 64
Model Number: 3500+
Frequency (MHz): 2200
L2 Cache Size: 512KB
Socket: AM2
Stepping: F2
Manufacturing Tech (CMOS): 90nm SOI
Wattage (W):
System Bus (MHz): 2000

As you can see, there's nothing beside Wattage. At this stage, the choice is
between 35 or 62. Isn't this to operate at 2200 MHz, the maximum frequency?


Reply With Quote