traveler 66 wrote:

> I don't use privacy.li for surfing, but my experience with them for usenet
> and anonymity services has been very positive. They provide excellent
> honest service and always come through despite the trolls that try to put
> them down or take what they say completely out of context. Get over it.

Just to rephrase it: You think that a service that directs your traffic
over servers chosen by the vendor himself has any relation to anonymity?
I'd call it a centralized wiretapping solution.

> I'll bet securestar has had excellent feedback from the people that have
> bought through them regarding any privacy.li products and services, that's
> why they have sold them for so long. These guy's are in the privacy
> business and go to whom they find provides an excellent product, they don't
> listen to anono trolls only their customers no doubt.

Securestar's "1344 Bit military strength encryption" has been namend on
the snake-oil FAQ for good reason.

>> No longer. I'm sending a symbolic CD burned with a copy of the software
>> I once paid for and a letter explaining why I'll not soil my hardware
>> with their dross ever again. It's Truecrypt or PGPDisk from now on. No
>> exceptions. No spamming scammers welcome here.
>
> Flush

Try the 'sync' command! :-)

Indeed, he has a clear and justified point, but he's been spamming in
first place.