On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 17:02:30 +0000 (UTC), in
<i3hf75$fda$1@news.eternal-september.org>, Justin <nospam@insightbb.com>
wrote:

>John Navas wrote on [Fri, 06 Aug 2010 09:52:23 -0700]:
>> On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 16:22:41 +0000 (UTC), in
>> <i3hcsh$sb9$1@news.eternal-september.org>, Justin <nospam@insightbb.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>John Navas wrote on [Fri, 06 Aug 2010 08:27:02 -0700]:
>>
>>>>>AT&T's problems in the SF Bay Area are well known, but AT&T is still
>>>>>usable by most residents that don't live outside the suburbs in the
>>>>>hills and valleys where Verizon works fine.
>>>>
>>>> AT&T actually works great here in the SF Bay Area.
>>>
>>>Not according to EVERY SINGLE tech journalist who lives there
>>
>> Have you actually used it? I have.
>
>When everyone agrees, including AT&T, that there are issues,

Not true.

>I don't
>have to actually use it. That's WHY we have reviews and tech journos.

In other words, you haven't. You're guessing.

--
John

"Assumption is the mother of all screw ups."
[Wethern’s Law of Suspended Judgement]