"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4m7p7vF4q8b2U1@individual.net...
> ...
> Most of us arent so puny that that is anything more than an academic
> difference.

Yes, Ron is Superman. Weight is academic to Ron.

> Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.

Yes, Ron's replies are always so mature.

> Hardly anyone prefers those to mice, and the OP clearly doesnt.

Read the original post and notice trackballs were never discussed by
the OP. Ron has made himself the OP because what he wants must be
what the OP wants.

> You could have got radical and applied your boot to the kid's arses.

We see how well that worked with Ron. Yeah, advice from a single,
never married male who gets to use all of his domicle for his
egocentric needs.

> Even someone as stupid as you should be able to manage that too.

Ron is a member of Mensa. Everyone that disagrees with him is stupid
and everyone that agrees is, ahem, as smart as he.

> Just another of your pathetic little pig ignorant drug crazed
> fantasys.

Repeated from his last posts. Ron just can't come up with new
insults.

> Even someone as stupid as you should have
> noticed that that aint the OP's situation.

Ron can't distinguish between the OP and himself to realize when
replies are directed to him and not to the OP.

> You have always been, and always will be, completely and utterly
> irrelevant.

If you disagree with Ron, you must be irrelevant. Uh huh.

> Pity that aint the OP's situation either.

You aren't the OP, Ron.

> Your problem, child.

Yeah, that must it, Ron. Uh huh, sure. Do you feel better now?

> Wrong, as always. YOU pig ignorantly ranted about cordless
> mice getting out of range. If thats actually a problem, you
> can use a bluetooth mouse so that never happens, stupid.

Ron wants to insult so badly that grammer becomes irrelevant. I never
said there was a problem in getting to far away as regards
reliability. I discussed how the range, even greater with Bluetooth,
still results in interferrence for RF devices.

> Pity about the limitations on distance that the cord produces.

Especially since most users never get any further away with cordless
mice than they do with corded mice.

> Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed pig ignorant
> fantasys [that Bluetooth failed in the marketplace].

Ron is enthralled with the clipboard since he simply pastes the same
insult over and over. Lack of originality.

>> You see Bluetooth engulfing the entire RF device market?
>
> Irrelevant.

Ron proves his level of intelligence. Doesn't matter if anyone else
wants it. It must be the quintessential technology if Ron wants it.

> You were the one mindlessly rabbitting on about cordless
> mice that cant even manage to do 3 feet reliably, child.

So Ron decides to evade by claiming that I discussed unreliability in
operation as opposed to the original topic of interferrence.

> Irrelevant to whether its useful if you do have a problem with
> interference
> between multiple mice and systems with cretins in cubicles etc.

So not only is Ron a single, never married male with responsibilities
beyond his own egocentric needs, he doesn't work, either (to become
one of those cretins in cubicles).

> No more than a nuisance with mice, you pathetic excuse for a
> bullshit artist.

Oh, the pain, oh, the inhumanity. I am now devastated for sure.

>> I don't recall ever hearing or reading of anyone that was found
>> wardriving into corded mice or corded keyboards.
>
> Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.

Copy & paste strikes again, and of the same incomplete sentence.

>> No, it's called EMF and it affects any RF device, including
>> Bluetooth.
>
> Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that you have
> never ever had a fucking clue about anything at all, ever.

Well, Ron wins. Less and less content, more and more *attempts* to
insult and berate. Just too boring to bother with anymore.