View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 09-18-2006, 09:52 PM
Rico
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Shaping the wireless coverage area - keeping it in the house

In article <av0rg2lfenonee6v1j50htceo4je5a35f7@4ax.com>, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us> wrote:
>rico_001@hotmail.com (Rico) hath wroth:
>
>>>If you want to block everything, and not just wi-fi, then aluminum
>>>siding, foil backed roofing material, and aluminized mylar on the
>>>windows should do the trick. However, be advised that these are not
>>>effective against cosmic rays and whatever the government is using for
>>>mind control.

>
>>Whoa!! Tinfoil AKA aluminum foil works just fine for all but the most
>>intense government mind control rays. It is misleading of you to suggest
>>otherwise. Cosmc rays are another matter, depends on point of orign.

>
>There are claims that aluminum foil works with mind control
>(psychotronic) rays:
> http://zapatopi.net/afdb/links.html
>I'm not convinced that they work as evident by the large number of
>government employees that act more like zombies than humans.
>Considering that the aluminum foil industry ships enough aluminum foil
>to totally cover much of the United States, one would expect that the
>country is well protected against mind control rays. However, the
>zombification of much of the government is sufficient evidence that
>the foil is largely ineffective.
>
>For real protection, I recommend using software instead of tin foil:
> http://zapatopi.net/mindguard/
>After installing and using the software, I have successfully resisted
>checking my email, avoided eBay looking for bargains, and even skipped
>my turn with online gaming. The software has reinforced my self
>control, dramatically reduced my tendencies toward compulsive internet
>behavior, and allowed me to see subliminal suggestions in everything.
>I'm waiting for the software upgrade that will immunize me against
>compulsively posting absurdities in usenet newsgroups.
>


I hope the mail man never makes this last delivery, too much fun would be
lost.

fundamentalism, fundamentally wrong.

Reply With Quote