View Single Post
  #53 (permalink)  
Old 03-22-2011, 03:42 AM
Steve Sobol
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Re: T-Mobile selling off to AT&T

In article <im8nau$jpk$1@news.eternal-september.org>, Cameo says...
>
> "The Ghost of General Lee" <ghost@general.lee> wrote:
> >>That reminds me how stupid that name "Cingular" was. I'm not surprised
> >>that soon after that company bought AT&T, they renamed the combination
> >>to AT&T. BTW, anybody remembers what Cingular's name was before they
> >>adapted that stupid name?

> >
> > In my area, it was BellSouth Mobility.

>
> It was something else in the Seattle area, but I don't remember what.


SBC was formed by the merger of Ameritech (former AT&T properties in the
Midwest), Southwestern Bell, Pacific Bell/Nevada Bell and Southern New
England Telephone.

SBC and BellSOUTH later merged to form the new AT&T.

The corresponding wireless properties made the same switches.

But Seattle has always been Qwest/US West territory.

On the other hand, AT&T's cellular division has always been
headquartered there. I think AT&T Wireless was what Craig McCaw's
original wireless phone service ultimately became.

--
Steve Sobol - Programming/WebDev/IT Support
sjsobol@JustThe.net

Reply With Quote
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45