"kornball" wrote:
> "Timothy Daniels" wrote:
>> Riiiight. The ol' cockamammy "Self-Turbulence" concept
>> of yours.
>
> Argue with th entire industry Tim, because that's how parts
> are designed to be cooled.


No part is designed to be cooled by laminar flow or designed
to be cooled by turbulent flow. They are merely designed to
be cooled. The system assembler has the job of choosing
cooling methods. The part designer just designs for the lowest
common denominator - YOU.


>> You'd just put on a bigger and bigger and BIGGER
>> heatsink until - by brute size alone - enough heat would bleed
>> through the boundary layer to cool the part.
>
> Clueless one, I don't decide what heatsink gets put on
> products you buy at Newegg, or any other major retailer.
> Independant companies make the same conclusions year after
> year, and disagree with you.


Name some. And leave out those ridiculous hobbyist-owned
websites.


> I'd say, "you're the only one that keeps trying to claim
> everything is difficult...


Provide a LINK to where I said "everything is difficult" or
that I had a "secret solution".


> Nobody cares about your silly idea until it is demonstrated
> to actually make a difference.


I just provided lots of links to manufacturers who say that
their product or design promotes cooling by increasing
turbulence.


> Silly claims without ANY examples of it making that
> difference are utter stupidity.


Utter stupidity leads people such as yourself to not
read the links that I just supplied at the start of this thread.

*TimDaniels*