On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 22:43:38 -0700, "Timothy Daniels"
<TDaniels@NoSpamDot.com> wrote:

>"kornball" tries to dance his way out:
>> I have argued that attempts to create turbulence before or
>> after the part(s) should be avoided.
>>
>> You keep thinking in simpleton mode as if dwelling on
>> turbulence or boundary layers as abstract topics, are the
>> only factors. Until you accept that flow rate matters too,
>> you haven't any change of seeing why you are wrong.
>
>
> I have never denied that flow rate played a part in
> cooling by forced draft. Indeed, the higher the flow
> rate, the increased likelihood of generating turbulence.


Yes, on the part as I'd clearly stated several times.

Unfortunately you continually ignore that heated air also
has to be removed from the system, and that the air also has
to cool OTHER parts in same system too.

I'm done with the thread- you cannot claim your idea is
applicable to a typical computer without testing. It's
really that simple, no thought you have overrides proof,
while the rest of the industry could cause pre or post part
turbulence quite easily and cheaply if they so chose.