"kony" wrote:
> "Timothy Daniels" wrote:
>> And so what if bulk flow rate reduces but the
>> increased turbulence compensates?
>
> So you now concede that flow rate reduces.


Do you actually understand English?
"And so what if" doesn't concede *anything*.
It's a hypothetical phrase.


> Increased turbulence doesn't compensate for that.


On what do you base that?


> I've stated the issues several times, and you only a
> half-baked theory without any examples of introducing this
> turbulence, helping to cool any overheating parts.


There is nothing "half-baked" about the benefits of
turbulence to aid in heat transfer between a solid
object and a surrounding moving fluid. It is basic
physics and fluid dynamics.


> There's no point to your crazy ideas Tim, the industry knows
> better and you will be the only one with a louder or hotter
> system.


What industry? The modders cottage industry?


> I'm done with the thread since you never do anything but
> troll and pretend to cover something new that was already
> covered multiple times- but never a test.


It's interesting that not once did you address the more than
dozen links that I listed regarding the benefits of turbulence
in cooling. Old dogs prefer not to learn new tricks.

*TimDaniels*