Re: turbulent flow not bad for cooling "kornball" ignores evidence:
> "Timothy Daniels" wrote:
>> Here are some interesting discussions and comments:
>
>
> You still don't get it Tim, there is a flow rate reduction
> that does matter.
Why, then, do manufacturers of industrial cooling systems
design turbulence production into their systems?
Haven't you read the webpages that I linked?
> Everyone has already chosen NOT to create more turbulence at
> the expense of airflow.
Who is "everyone"? It certainly doesn't include Dell Computers.
*TimDaniels* |