Jackzwick wrote:
> In article <12gha0bbojqa218@corp.supernews.com>,
> Jer <gdunn@airmail.ten> wrote:
>
>> SMS wrote:
>>> "http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/13/cingular-bans-the-word-engadget-from-its
>>> -customer-forums/"
>>>
>>
>> Sounds to me like some screwball employee wet nurse got grumpy and
>> decided to appoint themself to pompous control freak status for a day or
>> two. Maybe they're on the street now, selling pencils.
>
> Are they allowed enough time to check every TinyURL to make sure it
> doesnt point to Engadget?


A firewall proxy could do this nicely and automagically if wanted, I
just can't imagine them wanting to, but I could be wrong.


--
jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'