> John, you're not fooling anyone, posing as different people.

I'm verifiably not John Navas, but I agree with the various comments. I've
often gone to his web pages for information that was very helpful. And he's
pretty good about answering questions here as well, although his style
obviously irritates some. That's fine, I can deal with it, and I'm sure my
own style irritates some in rec.bicycles.tech where I most-frequently post.

Probably the main thing that bothers some about John Navas is the "finality"
of his posts. He leaves very little room for error or opinion. I, on the
other hand, find it safest to assume that those times I'm 100% certain of
something, I'm usually wrong.

--Mike Jacoubowsky
Chain Reaction Bicycles
www.ChainReaction.com
Redwood City & Los Altos, CA USA

"Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote in message
news:elmop-AB22C1.18185904102006@nntp1.usenetserver.com...
> In article <efvr5p$nck$1@news.datemas.de>, "Sarge" <sarge@36db.com>
> wrote:
>
>> "Cavity Search" <nothingvalidforyou@thistime.com> wrote in message >
>> > Maybe he does own the newsgroups. Who cares? As far as I'm concerned,
>> > he
>> > can own all of them. At least he provides useful information. How
>> > many
>> > other posters can claim the same?
>>
>> Exactly. John has always been a big help to me.
>
> John, you're not fooling anyone, posing as different people.
>