Mike Jacoubowsky wrote:
> Probably the main thing that bothers some about John Navas is the "finality"
> of his posts. He leaves very little room for error or opinion.

When he backs himself into a corner, he attempts to take the high road
by redefining the topic at hand.

For example, his claim that propagation range is not a factor of the
frequency. In spite of us professionals that attempted to show him the
error of his thinking, he changed his argument by quoting us all the
other just as relevant factors and avoiding the direct topic he
erroneously stated.

Then there's the "extended GSM" issue. In spite of no references to it
in any trade journals or web sites, his response was (to the effect), "I
experienced it, so it has to be true" and "I have confirmed this with
another engineer".

And he never did tell us when the last time he opened a Nokia or
Motorola cellular base station to do maintenance.