John Navas <email@example.com> wrote in
> On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 19:51:06 GMT, "Thomas T. Veldhouse"
> <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in
>>In alt.cellular.t-mobile SMS <email@example.com> wrote:
>>> The results for 3Q2006 are in, with T-Mobile reporting today.
>>> See "http://nordicgroup.us/marketshare/3Q2006/" for the results in
>>> graphical form.
>>> There are graphs for the following:
>>> Market Share
>>> Market Share over Time
>>> Market Share Change over Time
>>> ARPU Over Time
>>> Churn Over Time
>>The text format you posted here is incomplete.
>>It still concerns me that you use the five large carriers to total
>>100% for market share when that is simply not true. That is like
>>saying that the total of the democratic and republican candidates that
>>ran for office this year is 100% of all the candidates. There should
>>be an OTHER column, as far as market share goes.
> Of course, but then his objective isn't objective.
Really? You are incapable of being objective and yet you point out the
flaw in others.
Stones- glass houses... do you get the picture, or should I be much
simpler about it for your dinosaur brain to process?